Â
When I worked at White Pages, a new leadership team from the US was temporarily installed to reignite the Australian business.
Every few months we gathered for an all company meeting, 500+ of us sitting in a theatre to hear our Chief Strategy Officer share plans and progress.
Let me tell you, this leader was big on applause. So big that she constantly paused to prompt round after round of noisy affirmation.
As a result, these meetings got longer and longer.Â
And longer.
In fact, they too...
Â
âWe have long assumed that those who rise to high office will be âgood chapsâ, knowing what the unwritten rules are and wanting to adhere to them.â
So writes British constitutional historian Peter Hennessy, whose âgood chapsâ theory of government (or as Iâm calling it, good eggs) has been under considerable strain.Â
This is not new to managing a business, of course.
We often have to decide whether to structure around good eggs or bad apples. Striking a balance between freedom and regulatio...
Â
Outcome bias is our tendency to judge a decision by its eventual outcomes instead of the quality of the decision at the time it was made.Â
In other words, that decision you make today, feeling pressured or frustrated, will be judged without the benefit of context.
No one will care what was happening to you or around you â theyâll only care how your decision turned out.
Two things to consider:
Â
We employ people to make our lives easier.
So why doesnât it always feel that way?
đ Because they either donât do what we want or they donât do it in the way we want.
Then, to change what they do, we assume what motivates us will motivate them.
Can you see the problem?
đđ When weâre âmeâ centric - seeing the world from only our point of view - weâre likely to find fault in how others behave if it doesnât match our expectations.
Itâs them. The problem is always them.Â
Yes, maybe. People...
Â
As author Liz Wiseman writes, there are five realities of working in an organisation.
A small percentage of the burden you carry is actual workload â itâs the muck that comes along with it.
And in my experience, most of the muck involves people.Â
Imagine then, having clarity about why people behave the way they do and how you can influence them for the better?
Imagine how amazing work could ...
Â
Itâs not that you donât see the red flags when you work in HR.
You do.
And you tell the line manager.
But then the line manager doesnât act.
This points to two problems.
The line managers donât have the skills â or more likely, the confidence â to influence their team members.
And HR donât have the skills to influence the line managers.
And when youâre employed to be experts in people, thatâs a difficult thing to admit.
But itâs not your fault.
It was only years after I worked in HR ...
Are you part of a distributed team? Perhaps you manage one?
It's new language, isn't it, distributed team? It means that colleagues who work together, don't physically work together. They're scattered around the state, the country, the world.
It's not quite the same as "remote work", where you and your colleagues might work remotely from your office some or all the time, but there is still a central office.
For distributed teams, there is no central office so everyone works remotely.
50% Complete
Register your interest and Bri will let you know as soon as the course is available